CART has a dilemma.
What engine and chassis configuration will its next generation Champ Car take on, and where will it
fit in the world scheme of racing?
In their heyday, Champ Cars were
battling with F1 cars for bragging rights as to the fastest cars on earth.
They were viewed as one of the top racing series in the world, which allowed it to be recognized
as an extremely marketable product in much demand. Then in 1996 the IRL was
formed with a
low-cost, low tech mentality and the entire image of Indy Car style racing took a
nosedive.
Recently, F1 has unquestionably pulled out to a
significant unassailable technical and marketing advantage. In 2005 when
the FIA launches its new Formula 2 series, it too will have an engine and
chassis up against the current grossly overweight Champ
Cars. As a consequence CART will again be bumped down on the worldwide
prestige/performance ladder.
How can CART sell itself to a race promoter and to fans as a top-level series if
it's inferior to even Formula 2? CART must rethink its entire
package.
Will there be a CART/Champ
Car?
I am going on the assumption that there will be a CART series in 2004 and beyond.
The series simply has too many big venues, good drivers and a substantial enough fan base
for it not to continue. In addition, with NASCAR becoming all-powerful with
its oval track product, and the IRL barely clinging to its oval track
coattails, there is a huge void in
North America for a first-class road racing series. The fact that CART drew
over 411,000 fans for its Mexico City race and over 300,000 for its Australia race
proves there is a real niche for CART to fill, not only in North America, but also
overseas.
If there is a CART, where should it fit in?
CART is uncertain as to what its next generation car should be. Rather than
presenting a business plan as to what its next generation car specs will be, explaining where
the series will be positioned in the new world order of open wheel
racing,
and seeking manufacturers who like that model, they are soliciting various
manufacturers for input and, not surprisingly, finding there is no consensus. Some think
CART should continue with the current economical single-supplier 2.65 L turbo engines in 2005
(or 2006) and beyond
or a variation with various manufacturers badging the package.
Others think it should use a V8-based normally aspirated IRL engine;
others believe a
small 1.8 L turbo should power the cars; and, still others think a normally
aspirated V10 powered car is the way to go, which was Chris Pook's
original idea.
CART must decide what it wants to be. In
2005, when FIA Formula 2 replaces Formula 3000, the Renault powered cars will be putting
out a rumored 650 HP in a light chassis. The dilemma for CART is that its current cars will be
significantly heavier than the new lighter and nimble Formula 2 car.
The Champ Car, with only 100
more HP, will not only look slower, but will probably be slower on almost every road course. CART will
immediately be relegated to a third tier product and its value in the world
marketplace will take a further nosedive. And the good talent
who are not immediately placed in F1 as drivers or testers, will
seek F2 instead of CART.

The ultimate racing machine
We suspect the Formula 2 car spec, when it is
announced, will be similar to the stillborn Premier F1 series, which was supposed
to use a full-size F1 car and a spec V10 engine with approximately 750 HP. As
I
have "preached and criticized" on a number of occasions, to be a proper road and street racing car
(CART's niche market) the new Champ Car should be dimensionally the same as a F1
car, but lower cost. More on that later.
To be marketable to a race promoter and
to race fans, CART is best positioned just below F1 and above F2.
On the world motorsports scene, F1 would still be the pinnacle, but in North America/NAFTA CART would wear that
crown and carry that image.
Today a Champ Car and an IRL IndyCar weigh the
same at 1,550 Lbs to 1,565 Lbs without driver. An IRL car and the current
Champ Car, because they race on high-speed ovals, must have a
heavier and stronger chassis
to protect the driver in the event of violent high speed
crashes into hard concrete walls.
Therefore, if and when the IRL decides to add road courses in
their schedule, they will do so with their current tail-heavy 1,550 Lb car.
By 2005, CART should not have
any high-speed high banked ovals on its schedule. It will have
morphed into a road and street racing circuit with a smattering of flat
ovals (Milwaukee and perhaps EuroSpeedway again) thrown in. There will no longer be a
need for a car with a ground effects underbody, which needs stronger and, therefore, heavier sidepods
that double as driver side-impact protection. Hence CART will then
have a lighter weight car that is more nimble on tight
road and street circuits, and, coupled with a F1-like screaming engine,
will certainly raise its image demonstrably.
The next generation Champ
Car
CART may be debating on what its next generation car should be.
The following is what I believe the next generation Champ Car should be.
What I propose below takes into account the need to keep costs in check while
elevating the image of Champ Car, thereby allowing it to be marketed as a "premier"
racing series and not some low-cost feeder series.
I acknowledge the
difficulty in balancing
cost, image and speed. Under the bodywork, it's a much cheaper car
than a F1 car, but outwardly to the viewer, it exhibits similar characteristics.
The sound
and agility are what make F1 cars so spectacular. Let's face it, F1 cars
appear blindingly fast (which they are). That's the image CART should be
seeking. This isn't stock car
racing folks. This is a, oh-my-God-look-at-that kind of wow factor
they should be
selling.
Formula One suffers
from a small following in the USA. Having a CART series that looks
and sounds more like F1, will certainly generate more fan interest in
the USA market that is now
monopolized by NASCAR. If I were Bernie
Ecclestone, I would be pushing CART in this direction, because as we
previously warned, the
War of the Worlds is upon us and if the
road racing cartel isn't careful, it will face possible extinction in the
USA.
The key to CART's success
will be getting car manufacturers back into the series in 2005 (or 2006). If CART
secures a reasonable
USA TV package with Viacom (CBS/MTV/Spike TV), delivers a reasonable international
TV distribution, and provides a sensible platform with a clearly defined niche,
they will come.
|
Description |
Current |
Proposed |
Comment |
| Purpose |
Ovals & RC's |
RC's and.... |
Current car optimized for oval safety.
New for RC's and flat ovals |
| Chassis make |
Multiple |
Single |
A spec chassis will save significant $$, price
caps on spare parts |
| Wheelbase |
126in Max |
118in. |
New car should be slightly smaller for tight
street circuits |
| Underbody |
Tunnels |
Flat Bottom |
More skill req'd. Reduce size of
unnecessary heavy sidepods |
| Overall Length |
190in. |
173in. |
New car should be slightly smaller
for tight street circuits |
| Overall Width |
78.5in. Max |
71in. Max |
New car should be narrower for
passing on tight street circuits |
| Overall Height |
36.0in. |
38in. |
Bodywork, to top of air intake 38 in. max. |
| Min. Weight |
1565 lbs.* |
1565 lbs.** |
* Without driver
** With Driver (i.e. take about 175 lbs out of car so a Champ Car will be
just 400 to 500 lbs heavier that an F1 car) |
| Fuel |
Methanol |
Gasoline |
With gasoline's better mileage, cars can have
smaller fuel tank |
| Fuel Capacity |
35 Gallons |
25 Gallons |
Less fuel to put in during stops will put
premium on tire changes |
| Engine Make |
Single |
Multiple |
1 make, multiple badges, or open it up to
competition |
| Engine |
2.65L V8 |
3.0L V10 |
15,000 RPM rev limit |
| HP |
750 HP |
750 HP |
No need to change HP level, just take weight
out of heavy car |
| Air Intake |
Turbo |
Natural Asp |
Take off turbo muffler, F1-like scream will set
CART apart in USA |
| Engine Sound |
Current.wav |
Future.wav |
Need we say more. That scream will make
CART sensational. |
| Engine Life |
1200 miles |
1 weekend |
Can't police more than 1 weekend with multiple
manufacturers |
| Starters |
None |
On-board |
If driver stalls engine, should have chance to
restart on own |
| Transmission |
Multiple |
Single |
Single supplier saves cost. 7 forward
gears, 1 reverse |
| Brake Rotors |
Steel |
Steel |
Carbon Fiber too costly and shortens brake
zones too much |
| ECM |
Cosworth |
CART |
CART must retain complete control of ECM with
multiple engines. |
| Traction Control |
None |
None |
Leave it to driver skill |
| Launch Control |
None |
None |
Leave it to driver skill |
| Wheel Width R |
14 in. |
14 in. |
Identical to F1 |
| Wheel Width F |
10 in. |
12 in. |
Identical to F1 |
| Wheel Dia. R |
15 in. |
13 in. |
Identical to F1 - Current wheel
makes tire too low profile |
| Wheel Dia. F |
15 in. |
13 in. |
Identical to F1 - Current wheel
makes tire too low profile |
| Tire Dia. R. Wet |
27.0 in. |
26.3 in. |
Identical to F1 - Higher sidewall
allows for more driver input |
| Tire Dia. R. Dry |
27.0 in. |
26.0 in. |
Identical to F1 - Higher sidewall allows for more driver input |
| Tire Type (Dry) |
Slicks |
Slicks |
Identical to F1 in size, but no grooves |
| Tire Suppliers |
Single |
Single, but.. |
Re-bid contract every two years. Best bid
wins |
| Testing |
Limited |
Limited |
Keep limits but need more 2005 testing to
develop all-new car |
The author can be contacted at
markc@autoracing1.com
Go to
our
forums
to discuss this article